考研英语阅读细节题目，是考研英语中经常考的题。那么，我们2020考研学子们，在碰到该细节题目时，如何来着手分析，并做对这个题目呢?下面，北京文都考研网小编列举题目，来给大家详细讲解，供考生参考。
真题再现
21. According to Paragraph 1,Ms Simmons was criticized for .
A. gaining excessive profits B .failing to fulfill her duty
C .refusing to make compromises D. leaving the board in tough times
21. 根据第一段，Ms Simmons被批评是因为 .
A获取超额利润
B未能履行她的职责
C拒绝让步
D在艰难时机离开了董事会
原文
①Ruth Simmons joined Goldman Sachs's board as an outside director in January 2000; a year later she became president of Brown University in Rhode Island. ②For the rest of the decade she apparently juggled both roles (as well as several other directorships) without attracting much criticism. ③But by the end of 2009 Ms Simmons was under fire from students and alumni for having sat on Goldman's compensation committee; how could she have let those enormous bonus payouts pass unremarked? ④By February Ms Simmons had left the board. ⑤The position was just taking up too much time, she said.
原文翻译
Ruth Simmons 于 2000 年 1 月加入高盛公司董事会，担任独立董事职务。一年后她就任布朗大学校长。在随后的几年间，她身兼两职，并未因此受到多少批评。但到了 2009 年底，Simmons 女士开始受到人们强烈抨击;她担任高盛公司薪酬委员会的职务，却怎能在无人注意的情况下轻易发放如此巨额的奖金呢?到了第二年 2 月，Simons女士便离开了高盛董事会。她自己解释说，这个职位占用了自己太多的时间。
题目分析
[答案] B
[题型识别] 细节题
[题干定位]根据题干关键词Paragraph 1和Ms. Simmons was criticized for定位到文章首段第三句“But by the end of 2009 Ms. Simmons was under fire for having sat on Goldman’s compensation committee; how could she have let those enormous bonus payouts pass unremarked?”文中短语“be under fire”是对题干中“criticized”一词的同义替换。
[选项分析]题目问的是 Ms. Simmons 受到批评的原因，答案就在“for”之后的部分，“她担任高盛公司薪酬委员会的职务，却怎能在无人注意的情况下轻易发放如此巨额的奖金呢?”这句话虽然没有直接给出她受到批评的原因，却用一个反问句告诉我们她做的事情，她作为薪酬委员会的成员让巨额的款项流失了，这是与她担任的职位不符的行为，即背离了她的职责，因此答案选 B。A 项的干扰源自于“have let those enormous bonus payouts pass”，但“让巨额奖金得以发放”并不等同于“获得了太多的利益”，故 A 项不对，属于断章取义;C 项“拒绝妥协”属于无中生有，原文首段并未提到;D 项的干扰源自于“the next years Ms. Simmons had left the board”，但这并不是受到批评的原因，而是结果，属于把原因和结果倒置。
在做细节题目的的时候，关键的是能够找处句子主干，结合上下文和语境这样才能避开干扰选项，选出正确答案，希望以上真题的分析，能够给大家一些思路和帮助!祝2020考研金榜题名!
