在秋季提升阶段，翻译硕士考研者要做的事情，不仅要牢固专业基础知识，还需要泛读一些报刊文章。下面，北京文都考研网小编为扩展翻译硕士考生的知识面，整理了MTI双语时事:研究称手机辐射不会致健康问题，供考生参考。
2020考研MTI双语时事:研究称手机辐射不会致健康问题
With 5G technology beginning to roll out across the world, old fears that smartphone radiation could have negative health effects are beginning to flare up. A recent report raised further concerns by suggesting that some phones are leaking more radiation than expected.
随着5G技术开始在全球推广，人们对智能手机辐射可能对健康产生负面影响的旧有担忧开始升温。最近的一份报告进一步引发了人们的担忧，报告指出，一些手机的辐射泄漏量超过了预期。
There is a huge amount of scientific data on the issue, making it increasingly complex for both consumers and health professionals to untangle. A new comment piece, appearing in the New Zealand Medical Journal on Friday, agrees the topic is complex but says any potentially harmful biological effects are more commonly seen in low-quality scientific studies.
就这个问题上有大量的科学数据，这使得消费者和健康专家都越来越难以理清头绪。周五发表在《新西兰医学杂志》(new Zealand Medical Journal)上的一篇新评论文章也认为这个话题很复杂，但表示任何潜在的有害生物效应在低质量的科学研究中更常见。
According to Mark Elwood, an epidemiologist at the University of Auckland and first author of the piece, New Zealand's Ministry of Health asked for an independent, objective response after an article was published in the same journal last December by Susan Pockett, a researcher at the University of Auckland. The Ministry of Health thought Pockett's article, which argued public policy in New Zealand wasn't doing enough to protect public health, was misleading.
这篇文章的第一作者马克埃尔伍德，也是一名奥克兰大学的流行病专家表示，去年12月奥克兰大学研究员苏珊帕克特在同一份杂志上发表了一篇文章后，新西兰卫生部要求做出独立、客观的回应。新西兰卫生部认为，其的文章具有误导性。该文章认为，新西兰的公共政策在保护公众健康方面做得不够。
Scientists have been studying the effect of RF radiation on the human body for decades, demonstrating that the major biological effect appears to be heating of human tissue. RF radiation is non-ionizing which means it does not have the energy to do damage to DNA.
几十年来，科学家们一直在研究射频辐射对人体的影响，证明主要的生物学效应似乎是对人体组织的加热。射频辐射是非电离的，这意味着它没有对DNA造成破坏的能量。
Pockett's article argued this is untrue, citing a number of studies that suggest biological effects of non-ionizing radiation go beyond heating of tissue. The new comment piece cites the numerous studies showing these biological effects, but questions their quality.
Pockett的文章认为这是不正确的，他引用了一些研究表明，非电离辐射的生物学效应超出了组织加热的范围。这篇新的评论文章引用了许多显示这些生物效应的研究，但对它们的质量提出了疑问。
Elwood points to a recent review by researchers at the University of Texas which reviewed over 200 studies and over 2000 tests of RF radiation on mammalian cells, finding only 9% of the highest-quality studies suggest genetic damage may occur, whereas half of the lowest-quality studies showed this.
埃尔伍德指出，德克萨斯大学的研究人员最近对超过200项研究和2000多项对哺乳动物细胞进行的射频辐射测试进行了回顾，发现只有9%的高质量研究表明可能会发生遗传损伤，而质量最低的研究中有一半表明了这一点。
The key to good science is reproducibility. It's one thing to show that exposure to RF radiation has an effect, but another thing altogether to be able to show it again and again and again. There remains unanswered questions about exposure to RF radiation, with both laboratory studies and animal studies showing no consistent health effects.
好科学的关键是可复制。一方面可以显示暴露在RF辐射是有影响的，但另一方面是也要能够一次又一次的表现出这一点。当实验调查与动物实验都显示不出一致的健康影响时，也就意味着暴露在RF辐射下的情况存在着暂时无法解答的问题。
That doesn't mean research will stop, and it doesn't mean the current guidelines enforced around the world will not be further scrutinized. However, the weight of evidence currently suggests that radiation from phones is nothing to worry about.
这并不意味着研究将会停止，也不意味着目前在世界范围内实施的指导方针不会受到进一步的审查。然而，目前的证据表明，手机辐射没有什么可担心的。
以上是北京文都考研网给出的“2020考研MTI双语时事:研究称手机辐射不会致健康问题”，希望对参加2020考研翻译硕士考生们，在复习中有所帮助!祝2020考研顺利!
推荐阅读：
![京网文[2014]2116-316号](https://bj.wendu.com/imgs/jingicp.jpg){kind=link}
